Processing the New Sports Media Landscape

People have always been drawn to sports. They love the competition, the athletes, the strategy involved. It’s an obsession, and it’s from this need to be involved that sports media emerged. Sports coverage began primarily with photography and coverage in newspapers in the 1800’s. This largely remained the case until the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin, which was the world’s the first live televised sporting event. Fans watched the game, they read about it, but the appetite for sports coverage was not satisfied. Recognizing this, Chet Simmons and Scotty Connal created the ESPN network. They premiered with the first episode of SportsCenter on September 7, 1979. It was the first 24 hour network for sports, where fans could access at any time the sports content they desperately craved. By 2011, ESPN had reached grown to its peak of 100.13 million subscribers.

The concept of ESPN was revolutionary for the time, but technology has changed, especially with the rise of the internet. New modes and platforms are now available for sports fans to engage with content. They are no longer reliant on, or limited by, ESPN and the local paper as an outlet for sports. The emergence of web content, podcasting, blogging, and social media have not only made sports content more accessible to consume, but have shattered the barriers to entry for the individual creation of sports media. Fans demand more involvement in and easier access to sports content. With the emergence and advancement of the internet, they now have this opportunity.

Fans Creating Content

Just twenty years ago, the media used to be an exclusive class in sports, dominated entirely my large media corporations and newspapers. To create content, you needed a full time job at one of these companies, media credentials, and some sort of official media training. This is because there was previously no way to distribute content to the masses without considerable resources. The internet changed all of that. The beginning of blogging and message boards began in the 1990’s, and the onset of a media revolution had begun to take place. In 2018, people have the ability to create their own web pages, post on platforms such as reddit and youtube, and download home-made podcasts with little to no cost to them.

While the casual fan usually only consumes sports content, there are people entrenched in sports culture that want more out of the experience than simply a bystander role. One of these people is co-founder of Sports Business and Analytics UVA, and co-creator of, Michael Rochlis. “Just the way I consume sports…there’s just more of an interest than the casual fan.”

People who love sports rarely just take what they are watching or what is being said by the media at face value, they are always asking questions. Now, with public databases such as 538, fangraphs, and sports reference, they have the ability to answer these questions in a verifiable way. “There’s always that extra layer, you read 538 and you understand some of the statistics…you wonder, what’s going on here and how that fits into the bigger scheme…[creating content] is very next level, it’s not just like, ‘I wanna watch the game, I just wanna see who wins the championship,’ there’s deeper questions that can be asked…I think it shows a much more constructive way to be involved in sports.”

Still, not all articles rely on advanced formulas and statistical data, but still it was rare that people were producing their own sports content just twenty years ago. The difference is, with the internet, there is now a platform to create content where it can be viewed by the public. For Michael, it has little to do with monetary capitalization, it’s much more about making a contribution to something he’s passionate about. “The goal is to be good enough to have content that some people will read, and it will be validated and reposted. I want people to say, look at what this kid wrote. I’ve never thought about a question this way, but it’s really interesting, the data checks out, and it was well written. That would be the biggest reward, not trying to get paid subscription.”

It’s not just a theoretical fantasy either, there are extremely popular sports outlets that began with just one passionate individual. The Ringer was created by Bill Simmons and got 12.71 million visits last month. His podcast, the Bill Simmons Podcast, “was the lone sports program among iTunes’ 20 most popular [podcasts].

Sure, his previous career as television personality and author had given him considerable resources, but nothing compare to what ESPN has at their disposal. Still, there is not one ESPN affiliated podcast that ranks higher than his. Someone who built an empire with even fewer resources than Simmons had at his disposal is David Locke. The radio voice of the Utah Jazz, David Locke started the Locked On Podcast Network in 2016 with a single podcast, Locked on Jazz. In 2018, “Locked On…produces more than 90 different podcasts – Locked On publishes over 400 podcast episodes every week – generating more than 3 million listens a month and growing.

Since there are free options for publishing a website or posting a podcast in 2018, the only barrier is exposure. And with social media, it is possible to gain that exposure without the significant financial resources needed for paid advertising. To promote content on the UVA Sports Business and Analytics website, “for any article, we blast out a tweet or two, and same with the podcast.”

Bill Simmons and David Locke consistently promote their content over social media, will Bill Simmons amassing 5.87 million followers by 2018. With the internet, the opportunity to contribute to the sports media landscape is out there, and fans are taking advantage. Whether or not they ever gain popularity or monetize their content, there will always be people eager to get there opinion out there in hopes that they can make a contribution to something they are passionate about.


Fans Interacting Online

Even when they don’t have the time or motivation to create a full piece of content, fans are clamoring to have their opinions be heard. There was a time when that interactions between sports fans were restricted to the people around town. The only way people could hear from their favorite player was from behind the podium or through a newspaper clipping. Players and fans have always had strong opinions, they have just never had access to the platforms that would allow them to voice those thoughts. Through social media, comments sections, forums, and players-only sites, such as the Players Tribune, a community of discourse has been created where anyone can let there opinion be known publicly. Through social media and web forums like Reddit, fans can join conversations, often using “burner accounts” that they create for this specific purpose. There were “more than 100 million NBA-related tweets heading into the NBA Finals” in 2018, and the /r/soccer subreddit itself has over 1 million subscribers.

In 2018, fans not only interact with other fans, but with players and media members as well. Athletes now more than ever can let their opinions be known through social media or on a site like The Players Tribune. Cristiano Ronaldo and Lebron James have 75.3 million and 41.7 million followers respectively as of November 2018. ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith has 3.83 million followers currently. Even local journalists have thousands of followers, such as Celtics beat writer Jay King with 38.8 thousand followers.

These public figures often have strong opinions, and expressing those opinions on social platforms opens them up to response from fans. Unfortunately, this open dialogue can often devolve into “trolling,” especially with the option of anonymity. Journalist Sam Robinson notes that “people…that might not deserve [a voice] based on the way they behave online, suddenly have free access to you unless you lock your twitter account or something.” What really is validating for people is that they know that a large percentage of the public figures they interact with do actually read what is said about them. “You see players paying attention to their twitter replies sometimes at halftime, that’s something I didn’t see when I first got in the business…I feel bad for the players that will just get reemed by these fans, it’ll just be nonstop…I’ve seen certain websites turn off their comments sections.”

Fan interaction is a great way for people to be engaged and feel heard, and it’s a force that has driven popularity and interest for many sports. However, it can be demoralizing to receive that amount or criticism on a public scale, especially from people whose only intention is to cause anger and illicit a response.

Fans Demand Easy Access to Desired Content

Remember the days of sitting in front of the TV watching Sportscenter, waiting for the host to finally get to the storyline about your team? It was not that long ago when people had to diligently sit in front of a television screen, or wait for the next day’s paper, to get the sports content they wanted.

We are a society on the go, and in 2018, access is paramount. For podcasts, social media, and online sports websites, all that’s needed is an iPhone and a pair of headphones. Bleacher Report reaches 250 million people worldwide, and as cited earlier, The Ringer and The Locked on Podcast Network also have massive following. As The Athletic has shown, people are even willing to pay for content if it is well written, comes to them conveniently, and encompasses their preferred sports and teams. “The company says it has subscribers ‘well into the six figures’ spread across its 38 local markets” as of September 2018, and it is still expanding rapidly.

Michael Rochlis personally gravitates towards the Ringer, in large part because of its accessibility and wide ranging coverage. “If it’s good, I’ll read about basically everything, so broad coverage is helpful there…I follow most of the teams in the three major sports, that makes it a little easier to consume it because [the Ringer is] not just focused on just a few teams,” as regional newspapers most often are.

Social media also has taken over as a news outlet, with people like Jay Glazer, Adam Schefter, and Adrian Wojnarowski all breaking stories. Even other fans will frequently live tweet information and updates about games. Sam Robinson acknowledges that “I have to update scores live…[and] I am able to do this from afar…there’s no way I’d have been able to have done that a few years ago.”

With this increased competition from new on demand media, there is a deleterious effect on large media corporations such as ESPN and traditional print papers that might not be as convenient. According to former ESPN executive Jamie Horowitz, “‘SportsCenter’ ratings had dropped 27 percent since 2010. Over the last five years, ‘SportsCenter’ ratings in the 18-to-34 demo are down 36 percent.” Horowitz also believes that “news-driven shows like “SportsCenter” do not work well on television anymore since highlights are so readily available online.

Overall, ESPN has “lost nearly 13 million subscribers in the last six years, from its peak of 100.12 million in 2011 to 87.22 million in the most recent estimates.” As a result, ESPN has been forced to layoff a large number of its employees. “ESPN laid off around 300 employees — many of them working behind the scenes — in October 2015. Then, in April [2017], the network cut roughly 100 jobs, with the reductions coming from ESPN’s stable of on-air talent and online journalists.

Because of these challenges, ESPN has begun to increase their social media presence by constantly putting out highlights on Instagram and Twitter. They even now post short Sportscenter episodes on Snapchat. The company also developed the ESPN app as a source of sports news. They have expanded their podcast network by posting many of their on air shows as podcasts, and through the creation of programming such as 30 for 30 podcasts.

In addition to corporations such as ESPN, print news has been faced with challenges in attracting sports fans to more traditional modes of consumption as well. Sam Robinson used to work full time at St. Joseph News Press in Kansas City, but he noticed that all across the industry “positions were getting cut, wages were pretty stagnant, and the responsibilities just kept growing.”

Now he’s a self described freelance writer, and works part time for the Cleveland Plain Dealer, along with the online sites Pro Football Rumors and Yardbarker. There are options out there for sports writers, but many have moved away from traditional newspapers. “The landscape changing has kind of benefitted me because…two of the main companies I work for couldn’t have existed 5 years ago…I got on with Pro-Football rumors, and that didn’t even exist until 2014.”

Writers are gravitating towards these online sites that are more convenient, provide broader coverage, and therefore have better opportunities to be profitable. For Sam and other writers, “it’s an interesting time but it’s also a scary time because of all of the cuts being made…All of these really talented writers now all work at [the Athletic]…I don’t know that many people who still read print newspapers, which is unfortunate because this is some of the best reporting that’s ever been done but it’s done on dwindling resources.”

Newspapers have been trying to make adjustments to maximize their profitability in the modern landscape by transitioning to online and making their content easier to access, but they have yet to find a reliable business model. Sam recalls, “back when I was getting into [writing] basically everything was free, and newspapers were wondering if they were making a mistake having the online content or free and making you pay for the print…a lot of the newspaper websites now cost money, they had it for free for ten years and now they’ve switched back to making you pay for it…it’s a self sustaining process.”

One of the main problems that newspapers have had is that sports fans have to pay for the whole bundle that is the newspaper, rather than just paying for the sports section. Some newspapers now allow subscribers to just subscribe to the sports section, but it has still been difficult to compete with the broad coverage and often free content of online sites.

Regardless of how newsprint and large media corporations adjust, it has become obvious that television news programs such as SportsCenter and traditional print papers will no longer be the primary way fans consume media. People want on the go, on demand, access to the sports media that they as individuals are interested in, and the outlets that deliver on this will be the ones that thrive.

pasted image 0

The Economic Impact of New Sports Media

The economic impact of the shift from traditional sports media to these new forms of media has been profound. As the fan has shifted to new modes of consumption, opportunities for profit have become abundant. The podcast industry alone has grown “from $69 million in 2015 to $119 million the following year and to $220 million in 2017,” and is likely to continue this upward trend going forward.

The Athletic received 20 million in venture capital funding this year. This adds on top of the 2.3 million they received in January 2017, and an additional 5.6 million that July. The willingness for investors to sink so much money into a company such as the Athletic that is not even close to profitability shows how bullish they are on the potential for future growth.

Even the multimedia juggernaut Disney has experienced the pressure of the new sports media landscape. “Disney’s high-profile ESPN had a decrease in advertising,” and this lower advertising revenue comes primarily from the decrease in viewing audience for their major flagship networks. Disney and ESPN realize that they have to transition to more easily accessible forms of communication, specifically with the introduction of the nsew streaming app ESPN+. Even though this would compete with their major television networks, executives are acknowledging that consumers demand constant access to their content on demand, and they are adapting accordingly. Disney’s cable networks actually “had an operating loss of 5% …associated with the ESPN+ launch,” and yet the company continues to push the service.

As consumer demands surrounding sports content continue to change, media companies will be forced to adjust. With the decline in any one particular medium, opportunity has traditionally arisen in a new and expanding field. As companies like The Athletic have proven, the chance to capitalize is out there.


Technology has allowed fans the opportunity to create content, interact with the sports community, and access the information they desire from anywhere. This has caused a significant amount of disruption in traditional sports media. As ESPN and typical print struggle to adapt, new media is emerging everywhere, whether that be from professional sites or via the common fan.

The sports community is now more accessible and interactive than ever, and the means we have to communicate will only improve with new innovation. Following sports is no longer sitting in front of a TV screen waiting to see what will happen to be talked about next. The fans are driving this revolution, and they are benefitting from all the new innovations that have arisen. As new modes emerge with innovative developments in technology, fans will have even more power to engage with content on multiple levels. The way we follow sports will continually  evolve, but as it always has, it will only strengthen our unwavering obsession for sports.

Continue Reading

The Madness of March


Beller, Michael. “Complete Cheat Sheet for Selection Sunday.”, Sports Illustrated, 9 Mar. 2018.

Elliott, Julia. “NCAA Men’s Dataset.” Kaggle, Feb. 2018.

Krqehawakonte. “How the NCAA Decides Where Tournament Games Are Played.” KRQE, KRQE, 16 Mar. 2015.

“NCAA Tournament History.” “How the Field of 68 Teams Is Picked for March Madness.”, NCAA, 4 Nov. 2018.

Otterson, Joe. “NCAA Championship Game Viewership Drops 28% From 2017.” Variety, Variety, 3 Apr. 2018.

Continue Reading


History of Professional Women’s Basketball in the US

Professional women’s basketball in the United States is fairly new compared to men’s basketball as to only existing for the past 25 years. The first professional league for women was the American Basketball League (ABL). The ABL was founded in 1995; playing the first official season in 1996. Steve Hamms, Anne Cribbs, and Gary Cavalli wee the owners of the women’s basketball league. The league signed majority of the players from the 1996 USA women’s national team which included players like Jennifer Azzi, Teresa Edwards, Rebecca Lobo, Nikki McCray, Dawn Staley, and Sheryl Swoopes. These profound players made the ABL at the time, more competitive than their rival league the WNBA.

The WNBA  was founded on April 24, 1996 as the NBA Board of Governors approves the Women’s National Basketball Association to play in the summer of 1997. Former UVA standout Val Ackerman was the first WNBA president. Before anyone was signed to be a part of the league, it announced that NBC, ESPN and Lifetime Television would be its broadcasting partners. The WNBA season would be played in the summer because the sports calendar was less crowded which would give them more televised games. The WNBA began with eight teams: Charlotte Sting, Cleveland Rockers, Houston Comets, New York Liberty, Los Angeles Sparks, Phoenix Mercury, Sacramento Monarchs, and the Utah Starzz. The WNBA was the only professional women’s league receiving full support from the NBA.

Even though the WNBA was supported by the NBA, the ABL provided higher salaries. The two leagues did not compete for coverage either. The ABL was played during the winter and the WNBA was played during the summer. Even though the ABL could give their players more money, the WNBA over powered them with their financial resources.

Most of the ABL’s problems were internally caused. The league was a single- entity structure so they could control costs. Although the league could control its cost, all minor decisions that needed to be made had to go through the league office in California. Majority of the time, league officials were more focused on the sponsorships from the national level which created problems with organizations trying to connect with and market themselves locally. With all of these issues and the constant reminder of the financial burden, the ABL dismantled. The WNBA is now the only professional basketball league in the US for women. The WNBA has existed for last 22 years; 1996 being their first inaugural season.

History of Professional Men’s Basketball in the US

Before the NBA was ever in the picture, there was two leagues that were dominant in the US. The Basketball Association of America (BAA) and the National Basketball League (NBL) were the two leagues that were constantly competing against each other. The NBL was first established in 1937. The original name of the league was the Midwest Basketball Conference (MBC). The BAA was later founded in 1946. The league played in major cities and big arenas. The BAA gave the NBL problems when it came to fan support. On August 3, 1949, the BAA and the NBL came out with a deal to merge both leagues which created the profound NBA. The National Basketball Association (NBA) has been around for the last 72 years and it keeps getting better and better every year.

As the NBA continued to grow for their first 40+ years, the Association was in a position to approve the WNBA an assist in financial and media coverage support.

Even though these two leagues highlight the BEST talent in the world in the sport of basketball, there is a lot of inequality between the men and the women. There has always been a difference between the NBA and WNBA, being that the WNBA is only 22 years young.When we look at the differences of the two profound leagues, the three areas where we can find a significant gap between the professional athletes are revenue, exposure and salaries.


In 2017, the WNBA brought in $52.4 million dollars. On the other hand, the NBA brought in 7.37 billion dollars.

That is a big difference.

In regards to ticket sales, the WNBA has 7,716 fans a game. Tickets are around $17.42. That means the WNBA averages $134,412.72 a game from only tickets. To compare, the NBA averaged about 17,830 fans a game. Tickets are on average $89.00. That is $1,586,870 off of just ticket sales on average. This number is subject to change as the ticket prices vary from thousands of dollars to just $50.

Ticket sales play a big part in revenue, but this is not the only way these leagues make money. They also make money off of television time, exposure, and sponsorships.

The WNBA sponsorships on average give the WNBA close to 1.1 million dollars.

As far as percentages given to the players, the WNBA gives only 22% of revenue to its players.

The NBA on the other hand, gives there players 50% of their revenue.

Let that sink in.


Women sports only get 5% of all sports media coverage and 95% of coverage belong to men. Out of that 5%, the WNBA only gets 2% of coverage on television.

 2%                   77%

(WNBA coverage)                     (NBA coverage)

The numbers speak for itself.

The WNBA is more than likely shown on ESPN2, ESPN3+, or NBA TV. The NBA games are shown on ABC, NBC, ESPN, TNT, and ESPN2.

ESPN pays the WNBA 25 million dollars for the right to broadcast their games. Only 6 of the WNBA games are played on ESPN, 3 on ESPN 2, and 5 on NBA TV. There are 34 games played in the WNBA season, not including the playoffs.

Exposure impacts the amount of money the league generates and ultimately impacts the salary players receive.

Salary has been a common issue most people are more familiar about. The pay gap between the WNBA and the NBA are a crucial part of their differences.

One of the best in the WNBA Diana Taurasi, WNBA champion and won MVP of the league multiple times, only receives $758,072. A well decorated player in the league and well known around the country receives as much as a bench player in the NBA.

The average bench player in the NBA makes $900,000.

Imagine if you were not a Diana Taurasi.

A rookie coming into the WNBA averages makes $110,750 in their inaugural season. In 2017, the first draft round pick of the NBA, Markelle Fultz made 7 million dollars in his rookie season.

7 million dollars. 

Is this the only sport that has a big gap in many areas? No, there are a lot of sports dealing with a gender gap. Soccer and tennis are the other two sports that have a clear distinct line between men and women. The conversation is still on going with a lot of athletes, both men and women, standing up for the equality in pay and coverage for women in sports. Women like Serena Williams, Candace Parker, Skylar Diggins have been a part of campaigns, spoke out about the inequalities that they face as women in the sports realm everyday.

So, we wonder why women speak out about equality. Why do women think they should get paid as much as the men? The numbers show that even though the revenue generate is not as much as the men, the women still generate a nice amount of money. The only big difference between the two leagues is that the NBA gives their professional athletes 50% of their revenue earnings. On the other hand, the WNBA only gives their professional athletes 22%. 

In addition to all of these problems, the NBA could help the WNBA tremendously. Advertising the upcoming WNBA games during the NBA games. Having star players from the WNBA talk about the hardworking these women put out on the floor. The NBA could spark interest in the WNBA and change their outlook exponentially.

The WNBA has received better ratings, more fans, raised more money as the years have gone on. In regards to equality, there is still a lot of work to do.



Continue Reading
1 2 3 5